1. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Aikenhead, G. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonized and the colonized. In W.-M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), Science as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 151–166). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
3. Alberts, R. (2010). Discovering science through art-based activities. Learning Disabilities: A Multi-Disciplinary Journal, 16(2), 79–80.Google Scholar
4. Allday, J. (2003). Science in science fiction. Physics Education, 38, 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Allen, D. (2012). “Playing” with science. Primary Science, 121, 21–24.Google Scholar
6. Alrutz, M. (2004). Granting science a dramatic license: Exploring a 4th grade science classroom and the possibilities for integrating drama. Teaching Artist Journal, 2, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Alsop, S. (Ed.). (2005). Beyond Cartesian dualism. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
8. Aubusson, P., Fogwill, S., Barr, R., & Percovic, L. (1997). What happens when students do simulation-role-playing in science? Research in Science Education, 27, 565–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bailey, S., & Watson, R. (1998). Establishing basic ecological understanding in younger pupils: A pilot evaluation of a strategy based on drama/role play. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Battles, D., & Rhoades, H. (2005). An interdisciplinary approach to art and science: A college course on art and geology. In M. Strokrocki (Ed.), Interdisciplinary art education: Building bridges to connect disciplines and cultures (pp. 77–87). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.Google Scholar
11. Begoray, D., & Stinner, A. (2005). Representing science through historical drama. Lord Kelvin and the age of the earth debate. Science & Education, 14, 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Bharucha, J. (2006). Education as we know it does not accomplish what we believe it does. Retrieved March 3, 2006, from http://www.edge.org/q2006/q06_10.html
13. Bohm, D. (1998). On creativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
14. BouJaoude, S., Sowwan, S., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). The effect of using drama in science teaching on students’ conceptions of nature of science. In K. Boersma, M. Goedhart, O. de Jong, & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and the quality of science education (pp. 259–267). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Brake, M., & Thornton, R. (2003). Science fiction in the classroom. Physics Education, 38, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Braund, M. (1999). Electric drama to improve understanding in science. School Science Review, 81(294), 35–41.Google Scholar
17. Braund, M. (2015). Drama and learning science: An empty space? British Educational Research Journal, 41, 102–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: The sciences of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 131–142.Google Scholar
19. Brickhouse, N. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.3.0.CO%3B2-0'>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Brickhouse, N. (2003). Science for all? Science for girls? Which girls? In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education (pp. 93–101). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
21. Bruna, C. (2013). Motivating active learning of biochemistry through artistic representation of scientific concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 47, 46–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
23. Buczynski, S., Ireland, K., Reed, S., & Lacanienta, A. (2012). Communicating science concepts through art: 21st-century skills in practice. Science Scope, 35, 30–35.Google Scholar
24. Butterfield, Η. (1965). The origins of modern science. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
25. Caddy, J. (2015). The role of expressive arts in environmental education. Retrieved March 19, 2015, from www.morning-earth.org/arts_in_EE.html
26. Cajigal, A. R., Chamrat, S., Tippins, D., Mueller, M., & Thomson, N. (2011). Beyond the movie screen: An Antarctic adventure. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 48(3), 71–80.Google Scholar
27. Cakici, Y., & Bayir, E. (2012). Developing children’s views of the nature of science through role play. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1075–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Casey, P. (2010). Bringing scientists to life. Education in Science, 237, 19.Google Scholar
29. Caine, G., & Caine, R. (2001). The brain, education, and the competitive edge. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.Google Scholar
30. Ceci, S., Ginther, D., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science, 15, 75–141.Google Scholar
31. Chalmers, A. (1990). Science and its fabrication. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
32. Chalmers, A. (1999). What is this thing called science? Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
33. Chandrasekhar, S. (1987). Truth and beauty. Aesthetics and motivations in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
34. Chevalley, C. (1996). Physics as an art: The German tradition and the symbolic turn philosophy, history of art, and the natural science in the 1920s. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 227–250). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
35. Clavelin, M. (1974). The natural philosophy of Galileo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
36. Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between the worlds of family, friends, school and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Crowther, G. (2012). Using science songs to enhance learning: An interdisciplinary approach. Life Sciences Education, 11, 26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Darlington, H. (2010). Teaching secondary school science through drama. School Science Review, 91(337), 109–113.Google Scholar
39. Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion, and the appetite for wonder. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
40. Deckert, D. (2001). Science and art: Lessons from Leonardo da Vinci? In G. Burnaford, A. Aprill, & C. Weiss (Eds.), Renaissance in the classroom: Arts integration and meaningful learning (pp. 125–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
41. Dennis, M., Duggan, A., & McGregor, D. (2014). Evolution in action. Primary Science, 131, 8–10.Google Scholar
42. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigee/Penguin Group.Google Scholar
43. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar
44. Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
45. Dhanapal, S., Kanapathy, R., & Mastan, J. (2014). A study to understand the role of visual arts in the teaching and learning of science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 15, 2.Google Scholar
46. Dirac, P. (1963). The evolution of the physicist’s picture of nature. Scientific American, 208(5), 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
47. Dorion, K. (2009). Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 2247–2270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48. Dyson, F. (2008). The scientist as Rebel. New York: New York Review Books.Google Scholar
49. Eastwell, P. (2002). Poetry: Adding passion to the science curriculum. Science Education Review, 1, 2.Google Scholar
50. Egan, K. (1999). Children’s minds, talking rabbits and clockwork oranges. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
51. Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
52. Egan, K. (2010). The future of education. Reimagining our schools from ground-up. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
53. Einstein, A. (1949). The world as I see it. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
54. Faraday, M. (1978). The chemical history of a candle. Marietta, GA: Cherokee Publishing Company. (First published in 1861.)Google Scholar
55. Feynman, R. (1964). The value of science. In A. Arons & A. Bork (Eds.), Science and ideas (pp. 3–12). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
56. Feynman, R. (1969). What is science? The Physics Teacher, 7, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Feynman, R. (1989). What do you care what other people think? London: Unwin/Hyman.Google Scholar
58. Feynman, R. (2015). The quotable Feynman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Frazier, W., & Murray, K. (2009). Science poetry in two voices: Poetry and the nature of science. School Science Review, 8(2), 58–78.Google Scholar
60. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
61. Gardner, H. (1993a). Multiple intelligences. The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
62. Gardner, H. (1993b). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
63. Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds: Portraits of four exceptional minds and the extraordinary minds in all of us. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
64. Gardner, H. (2010). Five minds for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
65. Ghanbari, S. (2015). Learning across disciplines: A collective case study of two university programs that integrate the arts with STEM. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16, 7.Google Scholar
66. Graig-Faxon, A. (1996). Intersections of art and science to create aesthetic perception. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis (pp. 251–266). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
67. Green, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
68. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (1999). On problem situations and science learning. School Science Review, 81, 43–49.Google Scholar
69. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2001). The role of wonder and «romance» in early childhood science education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9, 63–69.Google Scholar
70. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2002a). The utilization of sensorimotor experiences for introducing young children to molecular motion: A report of a pilot study. Physics Education, 37, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2002b). From concepts to the great ideas of physics. Science Education: Theory and Practice, 3, 9–14 (in Greek).Google Scholar
72. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42, 985–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2015). A critique of science education as socio-political action from the perspective of liberal education. Science & Education, 24, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
74. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Fotinos, N. (2007). Imaginative thinking and the learning of science. Science Education Review, 6, 15–22.Google Scholar
75. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Garganourakis, V. (2010). Using Nikola Tesla’s story and experiments, as presented in the film “The Prestige”, to promote scientific inquiry. Interchange, 41, 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
76. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Savage, M. (2001). Α study of the effect of sensorimotor activities on the understanding and application of two fundamental physics ideas. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 31, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
77. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Schulz, R. (2014). Romanticism and romantic science: Their contribution to science education. Science & Education, 23, 1963–2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Hardiman, M. (2012). The brain-targeted teaching model for 21st-century schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
79. Heisenberg, W. (1971). Physics and beyond. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
80. Henderson, L. (1988). X rays and the quest for invisible reality in the art of Kupka Duchmont, and the cubists. Art Journal, 47, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81. Hendrix, R., Eick, C., & Shannon, D. (2012). The integration of creative drama in an inquiry-based elementary program: The effect on student attitude and conceptual learning. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
82. Herrick, R., & Cording, R. (2013). Using a poetry reading on hemoglobin to enhance subject matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
83. Hirst, P. (1972). Liberal education and the nature of knowledge. In R. Dearden, P. Hirst, & R. Peters (Eds.), Education and the development of reason (pp. 391–414). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
84. Jackson, P. (1998). John Dewey and the lessons of art. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
85. Jenkins, E. (1996). The “nature of science” as a curriculum component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86. Jenkins, E. (2007). School science: A questionable construct? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
87. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
88. Klassen, S., & Froese-Klassen, C. (2014a). The role interest in learning science through stories. Interchange, 45, 133–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Klassen, S., & Froese-Klassen, C. (2014b). Science teaching with historically based stories: Theoretical and practical perspectives. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history and philosophy for science and mathematics education (pp. 1503–1529). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
90. Klein, M. (1954). Mathematics in western culture. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
91. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
92. Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
93. LaBonty, J., & Danielson, K. E. (2005). Writing poems to gain deeper meaning in science. Middle School Journal, 36(5), 30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
95. Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
96. Lemke, J. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.3.0.CO%3B2-R'>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
97. Liguori, L. (2014). The chocolate shop and atomic orbitals: A new atomic model created by high school students to teach elementary students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1742–1744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
98. Matthews, M. (2015). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
99. McAllister, J. (1996). Beauty and revolution in science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
100. McGregor, D. (2012). Dramatising science learning: Findings from a pilot study to re-invigorate elementary science pedagogy for five- to seven-year olds. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1145–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101. McGregor, D., & Precious, W. (2015). Dramatic science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
102. Merten, S. (2011). Enhancing science education through art. Science Scope, 35(2), 31–35.Google Scholar
103. Metcalfe, R., Abbot, S., Bray, P., Exley, J., & Wisnia, D. (1984). Teaching science through drama: An empirical investigation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 2, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
104. Midgley, M. (1992). Science as salvation: A modern myth and its meaning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
105. Miller, A. (2001). Einstein, Picasso: Space, time, and the beauty that causes havoc. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
106. Mills. (2013). A qualitative study: Integrating art and science in the environment. Ph.D. Dissertation, Wayne State University. ERIC document: ED552989.Google Scholar
107. Moje, C. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction. Review of Research in Education, 31, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
108. Monk, M., & Poston, M. (1999). A comparison of music and science education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 29, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
109. Murphy, P., Peters, M., & Marginson, S. (2010). Imagination: Three models of imagination in the age of the knowledge economy. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
110. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school. Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
111. National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments.Google Scholar
112. Ødegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science. A critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39, 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
113. Osborne, J., Simon, S., Tytler, R. (2009). Attitudes toward science: An update. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California, April 13–17.Google Scholar
114. Pantidos, P., Spathi, K., & Vitoratos, E. (2001). The use of drama in science education: The case of ‘Blegdamsvej Faust’. Science & Education, 10, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
115. Pantidos, P., Ravanis, K., & Vitoratos, E. (2014). Incorporating poeticality into the teaching of physics. Science & Education, 23, 621–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
116. Park Rogers, M., & Abell, S. (2007a). Connecting with other disciplines. Science and Children, 44, 58–59.Google Scholar
117. Park Rogers, M., & Abell, S. (2007b). Connecting with other disciplines. Science and Children, 44(6), 58–60.Google Scholar
118. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2013). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
119. Peleg, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2011). Atom surprise: Using theatre in primary science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 508–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
120. Peters, R. (1973). Aims of education: A conceptual enquiry. In R. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 1–35). Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
121. Piersol, L. (2014). Our hearts leap up: Awakening wonder within the classroom. In K. Egan, A. Cant, & G. Judson (Eds.), Wonder-full education: The centrality of wonder in teaching and learning across the curriculum (pp. 3–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
122. Pongsophon, P., Yutakom, N., & Boujaoude, S. (2010). Promotion of scientific literacy on global warming by process drama. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11, 1.Google Scholar
123. Precious, W., & McGregor, D. (2014). Just imagine: Using drama to support science learning with older primary children. Primary Science, 132, 35–37.Google Scholar
124. Pugh, K., & Girod, M. (2007). Science, art and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
125. Rinne, L., Gregory, E., Yarmolinskaya, J., & Hardiman, M. (2011). Why arts integration improves long-term retention of content. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
126. Root-Bernstein, R. (1987). Harmony and beauty in medical research. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 19, 1043–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
127. Root-Bernstein, R. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis. Aesthetics and science (pp. 49–82). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
128. Root-Bernstein, R. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
129. Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127–151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
130. Sagan, C. (1980). Science and fiction: A personal view. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Teaching science fiction: Education for tomorrow (pp. 1–8). Philadelphia: Owlswick Press.Google Scholar
131. Schulz, R. (2009). Reforming science education: Part II. Utilizing Kieran Egan’s educational metatheory. Science & Education, 18, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
132. Schulz, R. (2014). Philosophy of education and science education: A vital but underdeveloped relationship. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), Handbook of research on history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1259–1315). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
133. Silverman, M. (2003). A universe of atom, an atom in the universe. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
134. Simons, S. (2013). “It gets under your skin”: Using process drama to explore race and privilege with undergraduate students. ERIC Document: ED 563183.Google Scholar
135. Sloman, K., & Thompson, R. (2010). An example of large-group drama and cross-year peer assessment for teaching science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1877–1893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
136. Snow, C. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
137. Sofronieva, T. (2014). Erwin Schrodinger’s poetry. Science & Education, 23, 655–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
138. Steele, A., & Ashworth, E. (2013). Walking the integration talk: An ArtSci project. Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 2.Google Scholar
139. Stefanich, G., & Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2001). Models and applications. In G. Stefanich (Ed.), Science teaching in inclusive classrooms (pp. 61–90). Cedar Falls, IA: Wolverton.Google Scholar
140. Stinner, A., & Teichmann, J. (2003). Lord Kelvin and the age-of- the-Earth debate: A dramatization. Science & Education, 12, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
141. Spencer, H. (1880). Education: Intellectual, moral and physical. New York: Appleton & Company.Google Scholar
142. Taber, K. (2013). Modelling learners and learning in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
143. Tanriseven, I. (2013). The effect of school practices on teacher candidates’ sense of efficacy relating to use of drama in education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13, 402–412.Google Scholar
144. Tauber, A. (Ed.). (1996). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
145. Tolstory, I. (1990). The knowledge and the power: Reflection on the history of science. London: Canongate.Google Scholar
146. Trefil, J. (2003). The nature of science: An A-Z guide to the laws and principles governing the universe. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
147. Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2013). Constructing representations to learn science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
148. Varelas, M., Pappas, C., Tucker-Raymond, E., Kane, J., Hankes, J., Ortiz, I., et al. (2010). Drama activities as ideational resources for primary-grade children in urban science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 3012–3325.Google Scholar
149. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97. (Original work published 1930)Google Scholar
150. Wang, M., Eccles, J., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of abilities but lack of choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 14, 1–6.Google Scholar
151. Waterman, A. (1992). Identity as an aspect of optimal physiological functioning. In G. Adams, T. Gullotta, & R. Montemayor (Eds.), Adolescent identity formation (pp. 121–176). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
152. Waterman, A. (2004). Finding someone to be: Studies on the role of intrinsic motivation in identity formation. Identity, 4, 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
153. Watts, M. (2001). Science and poetry: Passion v. prescription in school science? International Journal of Science Education, 23, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
154. Wells, G., & Haaf, M. (2013). Investigating art objects through collaborative student research projects in an undergraduate chemistry and art course. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 1616–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
155. Yokoi, C., & Yee, B. (2011). The art and science of notebooks. Science and Children, 49, 42–46.Google Scholar

1. Art Perception And Appreciation By Ma Aurora Ortiz Pdf Online

We investigated cortical activity in response to abstract and representational paintings in artists and non-artists. Participants engaged in visual inspection of works of art and recalled them immediately afterwards through mental imagery. Meanwhile, we recorded their EEG, and calculated the power of their alpha band and theta band activity afterwards. In accordance with previous studies, theta band and alpha band power differed between artists and non-artists; these differences were found to depend, however, on the abstract or representational character of the paintings. Differences between abstract and representational art, and between inspection and imagery, occurred in alpha band power for non-artists only and in theta band power for artists. These results were taken to suggest that effects in artists reflect sustained focused attention and perceptual flexibility; in non-artists motivation and engagement with the task. The results were essentially whole-head, despite the local character of the measurement.

The official website of the New York Yankees with the most up-to-date information on scores, schedule, stats, tickets, and team news. Military Appreciation; Fans. Neuroimaging studies have elucidated a basic picture of the neural correlates of the appreciation of beauty. 3 shows the areas that were more activated in beautiful than in not-beautiful perception, regardless. Pointed out many years ago that, in music, deviation from the regular constitutes an art principle. Similarly, fauvism. Oct 29, 2018 - 14 Dec Art Perception And Appreciation By Ma Aurora Ortiz Pdf' title='Art Perception And Appreciation By Ma Aurora Ortiz Pdf' />Most.

Art Perception And Appreciation By Ma Aurora Ortiz Pdf Online